Search Ctrl + K

Notebook | Diary | Lab notes | Resources | Garden | Anapoly

Values, Ethics & Ethos

Transcript of a chat between Alec Fearon and Perplexity AI on 9 August 2025


Alec said

<reference>Colleagues in Anapoly Ltd seek to bridge the gap between mystery or curiosity about AI, and its practical use. We want to help professionals like us apply AI tools to real tasks in a hands-on, transparent way.
<reference>Marjon University is interested in the possibility of a collaboration with Anapoly. The collaboration promises to extend the capability of both organisations for the social good.
<reference>Students are among those most at risk from the misuse of AI.
<reference>There is a risk that students might outsource their thinking to AI and lose or not acquire the ability for critical thinking.
<reference>Anapoly Notebook https://anapoly.co.uk/labs/
<reference> Anapoly Notebook is a website where we document our experiments in the day-to-day use of general-purpose AI. We reflect on what works (and what doesn’t), and share our thinking as it develops
<principle>There is a need to imbue students with values of benefit to society.
<principle>Students need to have an ethos of caring about how the human-AI relationship evolves.
<process>An LLM can be configured to support students to become wiser.
<concept>Anapoly Notebook will have an area in which philosophical ideas can be explored.
<process> Assume Anapoly and Marjon will run a collaborative project. This would be both a substantial piece of work in its own right and a vehicle for applied learning with AI. Purpose: to propose how values and ethos can shape human–AI interaction, using the creation of a substantive long-form essay as both a credible academic contribution and a live, documented case study in the effective, ethical, and collaborative use of AI tools.
<task>Clarify the distinction between “values” and “ethos”.

Perplexity said

Clarifying the Distinction: “Values” vs. “Ethos”

Values

Ethos


In Practice

Application to Human–AI Collaboration


Summary:

Both are essential for shaping a thoughtful and socially responsible human–AI relationship.

Alec said

<concept>Anapoly Notebook will have an area acting as a home for the collaborative project referred to earlier in this chat. <task>Suggest five appropriate names / titles for that area

Perplexity said

Certainly! Here are five thoughtful name suggestions for the designated area within Anapoly Notebook that will serve as the home for the collaborative project between Anapoly and Marjon:

  1. The Collaboration Studio
  2. AI Ethics & Inquiry Hub
  3. The Marjon–Anapoly Commons
  4. The Human–AI Exploration Space
  5. The Values-in-Action Lab

Each of these titles aims to reflect the project’s spirit of partnership, hands-on experimentation, and the exploration of values and ethos in human–AI interaction. Let me know if you’d like suggestions in a particular style or with a different emphasis!

Alec said

<task>Distinguish “ethics” from “values” and “ethos”

Perplexity said

Ethics vs. Values vs. Ethos

Ethics

Values

Ethos


In Summary

Term What is it? How is it expressed?
Ethics Codified frameworks that define right and wrong in a context Codes, rules, guidelines, systematic reasoning
Values Core beliefs or principles held by individuals or groups Choices, priorities, what people care about
Ethos Characteristic spirit or culture of a group or organisation Customs, atmosphere, “the way things are done”

In the context of the Anapoly–Marjon collaboration, having an explicit ethics framework could guide the responsible use of AI, shared values would clarify what truly matters, and a strong ethos would shape a positive, principled learning environment.

Alec said

Is it correct to say that values are embodied in an ethical framework which is put into practice through an ethos?

Perplexity said

Yes — that’s a fair and useful way to put it, though we might nuance it slightly.

Your statement — “values are embodied in an ethical framework which is put into practice through an ethos” — captures the general relationship quite well, but here’s a clearer breakdown:

So in sequence:
Values → inform → Ethical Framework → expressed and reinforced through → Ethos.

One refinement:
While an ethical framework often embodies values, it can also be influenced by laws, professional standards, or other external factors. Likewise, an ethos can reinforce values even without a formal ethical framework — in some communities, the culture comes first, and formal ethics follow.

If you like, I can create a diagram showing this flow so it’s easy to visualise the relationship. Would you like me to do that?

Alec said

<you said>While an ethical framework often embodies values, it can also be influenced by laws, professional standards, or other external factors. Likewise, an ethos can reinforce values even without a formal ethical framework — in some communities, the culture comes first, and formal ethics follow. <principle>Where culture comes before formal ethics, the culture has an implicit, informal ethical framework <task>Critique that principle

Perplexity said

Your principle — “Where culture comes before formal ethics, the culture has an implicit, informal ethical framework” — is reasonable and often true, but it could benefit from some nuance. Here’s a critique:


Strengths of the Principle

  1. Recognises ethics beyond codification
    • It correctly points out that shared values and norms can exist and guide behaviour even when they’re not written down or formally systematised.
    • Many communities rely on “the way things are done” — unwritten rules that still have moral weight.
  2. Acknowledges cultural primacy
    • In some organisations, the ethos and traditions precede any explicit ethics policy, and these traditions act as a de facto framework for behaviour.
  3. Highlights implicit moral guidance
    • Even without a named “code of ethics,” behaviours are often policed indirectly through social approval, disapproval, and cultural expectations.

Possible Limitations

  1. Implied ethical coherence may be overstated
    • A culture can have traditions and norms without them forming a coherent “framework.”
    • Some cultures are a blend of contradictory influences, where guidance is situational rather than systematic.
  2. Risk of bias and exclusion
    • An informal framework may simply reflect the dominant group’s values, which may be discriminatory or self-serving rather than universally ethical.
    • Formal ethics often emerge to challenge such biases, not just to document existing norms.
  3. Vulnerability to change or erosion
    • Without codification, cultural norms can shift quickly, be misinterpreted, or be lost when leadership or membership changes.
    • This fragility means informal ethical systems may lack consistency over time.
  4. Possible absence of moral reflection
    • A culture might be rich in social customs but poor in explicit moral reasoning.
    • Informal guidance can drift into habit rather than being grounded in ethically reasoned principles.

Refined version of the principle

You might reframe it as:

“Where culture precedes formal ethics, it usually operates with implicit moral norms, which may function like an informal ethical framework — though not always coherently, inclusively, or consciously.”

This keeps your core insight but acknowledges that informality can mean inconsistency, unexamined biases, and gaps in moral reasoning.


If you’d like, I can map out a diagram showing how informal cultural norms, values, ethics, and ethos relate and evolve over time — which might help Anapoly and Marjon visualise these interdependencies. Would you like me to do that?

Alec said

<task>Tie these ideas together into a explanation which distinguishes values, ethics and ethos whilst recognising culture.

Perplexity said

Alright — let’s weave these strands into a single, coherent explanation that distinguishes values, ethics, and ethos, while recognising the central role of culture.


How Values, Ethics, Ethos, and Culture Connect

At the foundation are values — the beliefs and principles about what is important, desirable, or right. They answer the question: What matters most to us?


Culture is the lived environment shaped by shared history, relationships, language, and traditions. It is how people actually live and work together over time.


Ethics is where values become explicit, systematic guidance for behaviour.


Ethos refers to the characteristic spirit or “feel” of a group — the lived expression of values within a culture.


Putting it Together

  1. Values are the starting point — our moral compass.
  2. Ethics is a reasoned map that guides how we apply those values in real situations.
  3. Culture is the social terrain where these values and ethics live, evolve, and sometimes clash.
  4. Ethos is the vibe or spirit of that culture when values are actively lived out.

Example (Anapoly–Marjon context):


If you’d like, I can express this as a visual model where values feed into ethics, which interacts with culture to shape ethos — and culture also loops back to influence values. This might make the relationship clearer and more memorable.

Do you want me to create that diagram?

Alec said

Yes, let;s see what it looks like

Perplexity said

Alright — here’s a visual model that brings together values, ethics, culture, and ethos, showing how they relate and influence one another.


┌─────────────┐
        │   VALUES    │
        │ "What      │
        │ matters    │
        │ most?"     │
        └─────┬───────┘
              │ informs
              ▼
        ┌─────────────┐
        │   ETHICS    │
        │ "How should │
        │ we act?"    │
        │ (rules,     │
        │ principles) │
        └─────┬───────┘
              │ applied within
              ▼
        ┌─────────────┐
        │   CULTURE   │
        │ Shared      │
        │ norms,      │
        │ traditions, │
        │ behaviours  │
        └─────┬───────┘
              │ lived as
              ▼
        ┌─────────────┐
        │    ETHOS    │
        │ Spirit /    │
        │ atmosphere  │
        │ of the group│
        └─────────────┘

Flow & Feedback Loops


💡 Anapoly–Marjon Example


If you’d like, I can also adapt this diagram into a circular model to show the cyclical nature of influence — which might visually suit the idea that culture itself can pre-date formal ethics and reshape values.

Do you want me to prepare that version next?

Alec said

Yes, let’s have a look at that

Perplexity said

Got it — here’s the circular version of the model so you can see how values, ethics, culture, and ethos influence one another in an ongoing cycle rather than a one-way chain.


┌─────────────┐
        │   VALUES    │
        │ "What       │
        │ matters     │
        │ most?"      │
        └─────▲───────┘
              │ shapes
              │
   reinforces │
              ▼
        ┌─────────────┐
        │   ETHICS    │
        │ "How should │
        │ we act?"    │
        │ Rules &     │
        │ principles  │
        └─────▲───────┘
              │ guides
              │
              ▼
        ┌─────────────┐
        │  CULTURE    │
        │ Shared norms│
        │ & practices │
        └─────▲───────┘
              │ lived as
              ▼
        ┌─────────────┐
        │   ETHOS     │
        │ Spirit /    │
        │ atmosphere  │
        └─────┴───────┘
              ▲
              │ influences
              └────────────── back to CULTURE

Why this matters


💡 Anapoly–Marjon example in this loop

  1. Values: Curiosity, transparency, social benefit.
  2. Ethics: Joint principles for fair and open AI use.
  3. Culture: Workshops, experiments, and discussions that normalise those principles.
  4. Ethos: A lived spirit of caring curiosity that motivates participation and trust.
    …and this spirit feeds back into evolving the shared culture and refining the values.

If you like, I can turn this into a polished infographic with labels and arrows that visually emphasise the feedback loops.
Do you want me to prepare that visual?

Alec said

Yes please, a polished infographic would be useful.

Perplexity said

Infographic showing the cyclical relationship among Values, Ethics, Culture, and Ethos with clear labels and flow arrows.